Jul 02 2010

Comparison: What’s Different Between the 4G63 and 4B11

Today, we will share with all of you the result of our research on the Evo X engine.The 4B11 DOHC 16V turbo MIVEC engine from the Mitsubishi Evo X is the latest talk of the town as engineers and performance tuners have lined up to get their hands on the new powerplant in hopes of unlocking the hidden mysteries that have shrouded the Mitsubishi powerplant.

So for today we will show the extensive details on the 4B11 T/C upper cylinder head.For your information, the 4B11 that found in the milder version Mitsubishi Lancer is rated at 152 hp and 146 lb-ft of torque, while the 4B11 T/C inline-four turbo found within the Lancer Evolution and ‘08 Lancer Ralliart sold in North America delivers a factory rating of 295 hp and 300 lb-ft of torque. Both engines sport the same 2.0-liter displacement but were designed and built by Mitsubishi engineers to handle two completely different power levels.

The 4B11 T/C was designed by Mitsubishi with a lower compression ratio (9:1) to handle boost and consists of numerous reinforcements to withstand a higher generated horsepower. The most significant change from the 4G63 engine to the new 4B11T was the change in material used in the block design. The 4B11 block, the first engine in the Lancer Evolution series that uses a die-cast aluminum cylinder block, is comprised of a lighter aluminum construction, which is considered a huge change compared to the previous cast-iron 4G63. Mitsubishi managed to save 27 pounds using the lighter aluminum from its previous cast-iron setup.

Read More at Kereta.Info Note: link is to Part 1 of 2, be sure to follow link at the bottom of the article to see it all.

Jun 03 2010

18th Annual DSM/Evo Shootout 14th and 15th of August, 2010

Presented by:
Buschur Racing, Dynoflash, Shearer Fabrication, AWD Motorsports and Exedy Clutches
-Saturday, August 14th. 9am-5 pm. Open house, dyno shootout and car show held at Buschur Racing in Wakeman, Ohio. Don’t miss this, it is a huge turn out and great time.

Read more »

Mar 03 2010

Evo X to join One Lap of America…

Tim Harper of the 2009 Galant VR-4 One Lap of America team:

Last year Steve, Mike, and I piloted the One Lap VR4 to a very respectable rookie finish. Hell, even getting that car home was a win for us. But what really made the trip a success was all the people that were involved and specifically the online community.

For 2010 there have been some big changes to the RochesterDSM One Lap team. The big news this year is we are bringing two cars on the trip. Chris Wirth is signed on to drive his GT30 powered Evolution X. We’ve also made a minor driver change. Mike Hayes who co-piloted the VR4 last year has moved into the alternate driver spot due to conflicts with work. Last years alternate driver Sean Caron has stepped in and will co-pilot the Evo X with Chris. Steve Burke and I will continue to pilot the One Lap VR4.

We are doing more then just adding another car we are combining forces with things like the web site, marketing strategies, and some sponsorship opportunities. This year sponsors will have three options for their money. They can put it towards the VR4, the EVO X, or both. This gives us the flexibility to not only sell to traditional DSM sponsors but to the new emerging EVO X as well.

In the coming weeks we will be rolling out updates to the web site, marketing and sponsorship information, as well as updates to the preparation of the cars.

Updates/Specs on the Evo X OLOA car can be found here: RochesterDSM OLOA Evo X

Looks like the precursor and the latest iteration of the ‘Evolution’ will be teaming up. NICE!

You can also read more about the One Lap Galant VR-4 here: Galant VR-4 dot org

Feb 20 2010

Tomei Tech Write-up on the 4B11T

Some Very interesting comparisons to the 4G63.

Interesting points of note:

  • Direct acting Cams- No more rockers.
  • Lighter remaining valvetrain components.
  • Standard exhaust valve replaced the previous 4G63′s sodium filled valves.
  • Timing belt replaced with a quiet chain.
  • 5 layer metal head gasket
  • Die cast aluminum block results in about 27lbs of weight savings.
  • 9:1 compression ratio- (as a point of reference, the first generations 4g63 was 7.8:1, the second generation was 8.3:1 and the Evo VIII, IX was 8.8:1.)
  • 4 Bolt main caps.
  • Ventilated upper main journals.
  • No more balance shafts.
  • Forged Mahle pistons.
  • Full floating wrist pins.

Tomei Tech. part 1

Tomei Tech. part 2

Feb 17 2009

Introduction to the 4B11 Turbocharged Engine

Abstract

Mitsubishi Motors Corporation (MMC)’s newly developed inline 4-cylinder turbocharged engine for the LANCER EVOLUTION X is introduced. This new 4B11 turbocharged engine (2 L) attained the 12.5 kg weight reduction thanks to an aluminum die-cast cylinder block and direct-acting valve train. A variable valve timing device MIVEC (Mitsubishi Innovative Valve-timing Electronic Control System) is equipped not only at the intake side but also at the exhaust side in this engine. This makes it possible to set the best valve timing for overall engine speed and improve performance, fuel economy and exhaust emissions. Furthermore, the low- and middle-speed torque and the response are dramatically improved by reducing pressure drops in the intake and exhaust systems and by revising the turbocharger specifications. Regarding environmental aspects, this engine achieved the 50 % reduction level (3;) requirements of Japan’s 2005 Emission Standard by means of a high-performance metal catalyst, etc.

1. Objectives of the development

The main objective set forth for the development of the 4B11 engine was creating a new turbocharged engine that is excellent in performance while meeting the needs of the times for environmental compatibility. In line with this objective, an aluminum die-cast cylinder block was newly developed with the aim of reducing the weight of the engine. The cylinder block in development also featured a rear exhaust layout, which is the first of its kind to be introduced for MMC turbocharged engines. The measures employed for better fuel economy included the Mitsubishi Innovative Valve-timing Electronic Control System (MIVEC) and a high-efficiency alternator. Started by setting “superiority of performance in the motor sports field” as one of the concepts to be embodied in the engine, the development had generous technical feeds from the motor sports know-how or DNA that MMC had cultivated and accumulated through World Rally Championship (WRC) experiences. This know-how was incorporated into this production engine.

2. Major specifications

Table 1 compares the major specifications of the two MMC turbocharged engine models, the new 4B11 and the previously developed 4G63.

3. Features

The following part of this section introduces the technologies and components adopted to attain the above-mentioned objectives of the development. Many of the technology and component items contribute to two or more improvements as shown in Table 2.

3.1 High performance engine consuming less fuel

The technologies adopted to undertake the challenge of creating a high performance engine consuming less fuel included the MIVEC system applied to both intake and exhaust valve mechanisms (this configuration of the MIVEC system was first employed in the 4B1 model engines) and optimization in the shape of the intake manifold as well as of the intake and exhaust ports. Adoption of these technologies provided the effect of distributing an equal amount of air to every cylinder, which in turn enabled the idling speed to be lowered without compromising the high-speed performance of the engine. In addition, the use of an aluminum die-cast cylinder block with improved cooling efficiency made it possible to further advance the ignition timing and consequently to reduce the fuel consumption rate. Also, the friction-caused loss of energy was reduced by the use of full-floating piston pins and through-holes made in the bulkhead of the cylinder block to lower pressure in the crankcase. Another improvement adopted for higher fuel economy was the use of a high-efficiency alternator, the first of its kind to be used by MMC. On the one hand, while it brought about higher vehicle performance, the application of these improvements, on the other hand, successfully achieved a fuel economy level equivalent to or higher than that of the LANCER EVOLUTION IX MR, despite the LANCER EVOLUTION X being 100 kg heavier than the former model.

Fig. 1 shows the performance curves of the engines on these two vehicle models.

3.2 Weight reduction and durability

The 4B11 engine has an aluminum die-cast cylinder block of reduced weight. The biggest challenge with regard to the employment of this aluminum die-castable cylinder block was to ensure strength sufficiently durable against operational stress while reducing the weight. The first measure to make this possible was fastening each of all the five bearing caps to the cylinder block with four bolts to assure strength enough to withstand high output operation of the engine. The second measure was the application of a semi-closed shape top deck with bridges to the cylinder block to minimize the bore deformation of the cylinders under stress of high-output operation. Furthermore, a ladder frame structure was applied to the cylinder block, which greatly contributed to the reduction in noise, vibration and harshness (NVH). Fig. 2 shows the structure of the cylinder block.

In addition to the above, other weight reduction measures were also applied, examples of which are the adoption of a direct-acting valve train and the disuse of balancer shafts. As a result, the weight of the new engine mechanism could be successfully reduced by as much as 12.5 kg compared with the 4G63 turbocharged engine.

3.3 Low exhaust emissions

The technologies adopted for simultaneously satisfying high performance and low exhaust emission requirements were compact-size fine spray injectors and optimization of fuel line pressure. Application of these technologies enabled improved fuel atomization while maintaining necessary fuel flow rate during high-output operation and eventually ensured clean exhaust emissions while the engine stayed capable of delivering high power. Using these technologies in combination with the rear exhaust layout and a high-performance metal catalyst featuring a shorter activation time, the new engine successfully reduced exhaust emissions of the EVOLUTION X to a level as low as less than 1/4 of the EVOLUTION IX, achieving the 50 % reduction level (3;) requirements of the Japan’s 2005 Emission Standard.

3.4 Improved engine response

An engine’s “high performance” is most often represented by large maximum output and torque. In the motor sports field, the engine response is another important performance factor. The 4B11 engine incorporates such improvements as an optimally shaped turbocharger compressor wheel, a straight type intake system and large diameter exhaust system piping featuring heightened response performance which is up to 18 % faster to respond to accelerator operation than the 4G63 turbocharged engine. Fig. 3 compares the engine response characteristics of the LANCER EVOLUTION X and LANCER EVOLUTION IX MR. Fig. 4 shows the details of the compressor wheel improvement.

3.5 Higher reliability

Unlike the 4G63 turbocharged engine which uses M14 long-reach spark plugs, the 4B11 turbocharged engine uses M12 long-reach spark plugs that enable the water jackets around the combustion chambers to be expanded for more efficient cooling. This, coupled with the highly heat-conductive aluminum cylinder block, lowers the fire-contact surface temperature of the new engine by approximately 50°C compared with the 4G63 engine, greatly reducing the thermal load upon the cylinder head. Fig. 5 shows cross sectional views of the cylinder head.

4. Conclusion

Exhaust emissions, fuel economy and other environmental performances of the engine will further increase their importance in the future. The situation will thus certainly impose a challenge of simultaneously nurturing to a still higher level two contradicting factors, namely high performance and environmental compatibility in order for us to make the next evolutionary step in engine development.